For those of you unfamiliar with what No-Kill shelters really do, here is a rundown of the difference between shelters & no-kill shelters.
Shelters will try to keep animals for a certain number of days, but if they are not claimed by their owners (in the case of strays, runaways) or adopted out (in the case of the previous examples along with owner surrenders), they are euthanized to make cages available for incoming animals. This is a waiting game with the most brutal of sand-sucking hourglasses. In typical shelters, dogs are selected based on the amount of time they are kept in the cage, with the first ones to go being any that are deemed not adoptable. There are extensive exams that can be performed (IF the shelter has the personnel and resources...) to determine if the dog is healthy enough and there are not any behavioral problems exhibited by the dog. Obviously, sick and injured dogs are put down because no one would be able to really devote resources to care for these animals.
In short, if you are a healthy, well-behaved dog that is kept in the shelter too long, you will probably be euthanized in a shelter. This will happen to you right after the sick dogs are put down for the day.
In a no-kill shelter, dogs that are healthy and not aggressive (regarding food, toys, or people), you will be given as much time as necessary to get a home. This includes going to foster homes to get away from shelter stresses and attending adoption events to strut your stuff.
The practices of hosting adoption events, fostering, and buying time for animals are similar in both types of shelters because everyone really wants to see these dogs find homes. The one drawback to the no-kill shelter is that if a dog is kept too long in a cage environment, the dog will start to go a little crazy and become aggressive toward people. When this happens, the dog will have to be euthanized to prevent any dangers toward people.
In the end, I hope all of the programs that shelters are implementing will continue to get the number of euthanizations down (working with other agencies, individual rescue groups, hosting big adoption events-like Petapalooza-and weekly adoption spots, spay/neuter programs for low income indivduals, humane youth education programs, and pr campaigns regarding pet overpopulation).
My personal standpoint is that you can have both the dog fancy (breeders that care about specific breed traits and quality of the dogs) and animal shelters working together. How? That is hard to define in a small space. I think that big breeding business should be made hard to do and that the small breeders that show they are not inbreeding receive better support from the shelters. Everyone is in this for the dogs, there is just too much politicking from the sides of only spay/neuter vs. breed responsibly. I'll keep pondering this, send your thoughts my way.