On my list of animal-related issues that I really want to write about (but currently have little time to transcribe):
The Pet Animal Welfare Statute: Senator Santorum (not my favorite guy, but he's doing something good here, I believe) is sponsoring this bill to amend the Animal Welfare Act to increase the regulations for breeding. There will be more USDA involvement for breeders that profit from selling 25 or more animals in a year (or over 6 litters in a year). There are many people trying to scare dog owners, fanciers, and their own senators from supporting this bill.
Here are some of the scary "facts" they are inventing:
-PAWS will put rescues and shelters out of business. (This is not true because rescues and shelters are not-for-profit entities that will not be affected by increased regulations from this bill. And even if some rescues are required to be regulated by the USDA, what is wrong with that? If the rescue organization is unable to obtain not-for-profit/501c3 status, they shouldn't be a rescue anyway because they aren't doing it for the greater good of the homeless animals.)
-PAWS will lead to a national mandatory microchip law in the US. (This is nowhere in the PAWS bill and this conspiracy theory is bringing the people who fear government and "big brother" out into this debate. That just makes this an ugly, irrational conversation that is clearly not about the welfare of the animals. And the latter is what this bill is really about.)
-PAWS will end all cat breeding and prevent many dog fanciers from obtaining good quality purebred show dogs--as most dog breeders will also be put out of business. (Again, this bill is for the welfare of animals and if you are a dog breeder that truly cares about the breed, you will find a way to set up the facilities that are required by the USDA to properly care for litters of puppies. Even if you home raise the pups, you still need facilities to care for them and not just an outdoor pen or a large box.) (As for cats and other animals, if you truly care about the animals, you will find a way to set up the facilities that are required by the USDA. If you don't have the money to do so, you clearly don't have the money to administer proper care and for veterinary visits for your animals if they become ill.)
-PAWS will prevent anyone from obtaining a purebred in the future since breeding will dramatically decrease. (The ability to get a puppy is like picking up a gallon of milk from your nearest store. Perhaps PAWS will make people wait a little longer, like waiting for your take out food to be prepared after you called in the order.)
-PAWS is just an alliance between unlikely bedfellows to increase their profits. (So the AKC, HSUS, and PETA support the same bill. So what does that mean? I think it is clear. They are all organizations that have committed to support the animals in some way. These three orgs. have very different agendas, but I don't think they are diverging on the issue of kindness to animals. Only those breeders that don't want to be regulated are clearly not concerned with the best interests of all animals.)
-PAWS is about intrusion into the homes of breeders. Oh wait, this is true. And if you can tell me what is wrong with it, I'd be happy to listen to what you have to say!
I have been thinking a lot about this, and I am still trying to come up with ways that the passionate animal people from the rescue world and the breeding/fancier worlds can come together to make this world a better place for animals and those who care for them. We cannot model our behavior after politicians who know only how to attack their opponents when it is time to talk about real issues. Avoid the problem, berate the other guy. That is how not to get things done for animals.
I think that PAWS will be a positive step in the lives of animals and that people from both sides should look at this bill as a meeting place for other, positive approaches to animal breeding and care.